The Seasonic Prime TX-1300 ATX 3.1 wins in 3 out of 7 comparable specs, with 3 ties. Its biggest advantage is Wattage (53% better).
C850 (2024) wins in 1 spec (MSRP: 66% better).
Recommendation
Choose Prime TX-1300 ATX 3.1 if you want the best overall performance — especially wattage.
Choose C850 (2024) if msrp matters more to you.
AI Versus Verdict
The Seasonic Prime TX-1300 ATX 3.1 is the objective winner of this comparison, securing more individual specification victories than the NZXT C850 (2024). While both units share several identical technical attributes, the Seasonic Prime TX-1300 ATX 3.1 provides a significant performance edge in total power delivery. Its most impactful advantage is its wattage capacity, which is 53% higher than that of the NZXT C850 (2024), offering substantially more headroom for demanding hardware configurations.
Users prioritizing budget efficiency should select the NZXT C850 (2024), as it holds a 66% advantage in MSRP compared to the alternative. Conversely, the Seasonic Prime TX-1300 ATX 3.1 is the superior choice for enthusiasts or professionals building high-draw systems that require the extra wattage provided by the unit. Choosing between these two components depends entirely on whether your primary requirement is minimizing initial expenditure or maximizing total power output for your specific build.
Generated by Gemini from the objective spec comparison above. AI advice is a summary, not a benchmark — always verify critical purchases.
